Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Toby W's avatar

I'm a university student in a writing and literature program; I've always had a bit of lingering impostor syndrome because I worry my writing is never going to go anywhere. I'm afraid of ending up like that Maugham character, Hayward, from Of Human Bondage, who is perpetually convincing everyone around him that his budding artistic talent will one day magnificently blossom--and then he's unceremoniously killed in his middle age, having never amounted to much.

In my first year of uni, I wrote one of the worst short stories... ever, I think. My professor gave me several very direct pages of feedback, though it could have been summed up by the sentiment of your agent's "I don't know how to say this, but it's not good." She thought the characters were awful, unlikeable people; their relationship was unconvincing; the inclusion of a character using "they/them" pronouns was too confusing; the plot was overstuffed; the comedy I inserted was painfully unfunny. I was embarrassed that I had even created it, mostly because it came from a place of such sincere passion and earnestness, and it had been a total failure.

But any idea that springs from that deep is pretty hard to uproot and compost over a little academic humiliation. And if the plot is too dense to fit in a short story, why not add 200 pages and give it some breathing room? A couple years later, I sketched out a whole novel outline, resurrecting these immensely hateable people (confusing pronouns and bleak relationship intact). I still couldn't bring myself to commit any words to the page, because of that question: Is this idea good enough? Will the words I write be good enough?

So I made a deal with myself; I would start writing it, and I would never show it to anybody. It wasn't *really* representative of the novel I imagined writing. It would be some playful hobby that nobody else would pass judgement on, with full permission to be terrible. This wasn't An Example of My Writing, this was just... writing.

Unsurprisingly, it's leaps and bounds better than anything I've written in the last couple years. Or maybe it isn't :) But right now, I'm the only one who gets to see it. It exists in the big, calm nothing.

PS. I'm taking a course on Chaucer and we just finished reading the Knight's Tale. I was struck by the descriptions of paintings in the temples of Venus, Mars, and Diana. It strongly reminded me of the paintings in the two castles in SGE... There's a fancy literary term for it and everything: "ekphrasis." Love your writing, books or blogs <3 Have a great week.

Expand full comment
Wayne C's avatar

To me, this is linked to your earlier post about villains. I know that my own insecurities will never allow me to think that something is good enough, especially when it comes to putting thoughts on paper (digital or otherwise). I have to give it to someone who will be an accurate, supportive judge; someone whose opinion I value and I know will not overlay it with their own agenda, jealousy, or well-meaning discouragement. You have to make sure your trusted evaluator is not secretly a villain. I know when something is NOT good enough. But I'm never sure if something I think is pretty good is REALLY good enough.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts